Please Sign my Petition to the White House on Change Org - Every signature counts
multihttps://www.change.org/p/to-the-white-house-the-dutch-and-the-german-government-put-wesley-clark-on-trial-for-his-crimes-ple-kidnappings-and-very-heinous-torture
Update - June 13 of 2015
Thank you all for signing my petition to the White House on Change org - June 2016
13. Juni 2015 — I just wanted to give you a quick update on the situation of my dad who is getting tortured.
I
have just this week send an enregistered letter to the Dutch Minister
of the Interior (Ronald Plasterk) in response to a letter from him
that I have received on April 8 of 2015. Mr. Plasterk who is
responsible for the behavior of the Dutch secret service AIVD (who
according to the Dutch King Willem-Alexander is aiding and assisting
Clark with my dad's torture) claims in his letter of April 8, that
the AIVD would not do anything like that, furthermore he claims that he has send me this letter in anwser to an e-mail from me that he claims
I would have send to him on February 5 of 2015.
That
is quite a dumb error that he made. On February 5 of 2015 I was
spending literally 24 hours non stop on the phone calling all sorts
of international government facilities, like for example the German
federal police BKA, the office of the German defence minister Mrs.
Von der Leyen and I distingtly remember that around 17.00 hours that day
I was phoning the secretary of Mr. Stoltenberg at NATO headquarters
in Brussels who was telling me straight away that the timing was not
great because NATO had a summit in Brussels that day with all of the
defense ministers of Europe being present and she was therefore very
busy.
So I had no time what so ever that day, to send around any e-mail to the Dutch AIVD or Mr. Plasterk. Of course it is not a giant surprise that NATO would easily communicate with all sorts of secret services and it is also no suprise to me that the Dutch AIVD is permanently hanging inside my own phone connection. So they must have followed every word that I was saying through my phone that day. It is however a very dumb mistake of the AIVD to put on paper that I would have send them an e-mail message on that particular day and have the Dutch minister of the Interior sign the lies that they have put on paper.
So I had no time what so ever that day, to send around any e-mail to the Dutch AIVD or Mr. Plasterk. Of course it is not a giant surprise that NATO would easily communicate with all sorts of secret services and it is also no suprise to me that the Dutch AIVD is permanently hanging inside my own phone connection. So they must have followed every word that I was saying through my phone that day. It is however a very dumb mistake of the AIVD to put on paper that I would have send them an e-mail message on that particular day and have the Dutch minister of the Interior sign the lies that they have put on paper.
In
response I have written 5 pages describing how the Dutch King has
admitted to me on September 26 of 2010 and on November 17 of 2010
that the Dutch secret service AIVD is aiding Clark with my dad's
torture. So I am very very curious as to the next round of lies and
bullshit that Plasterk is going to send me in return.
Furthermore
I recently finally managed to find a lawyer who wants to take on the
case despite of it being complicated. Even though my female lawyer is
very strict about certain things and claims that I need to be the one
that investigates every little detail about the situation and must
prove the case myself, because of the fact that the very corrupt
Dutch police in Nijmegen (the city where I live) is aiding Clark with
the torture and therefore refuses to investigate anything. So I was
trying to make her understand that people do not always have a camera
ready when they get confronted with a situation where someone is
getting tortured. That is just not realistic. Grabbing a camera is
usually not the very first instinct that one has, when getting forced
to witness a torture situation.
Since
I have started pressing criminal charges against Wesley Clark in May
of 2010 I have pressed criminial charges against him with the police
in Nijmegen, (the place where I live and therefore the only place
where I can press criminal charges in the Netherlands) but also with
the German federal police BKA (the German equivelant of the FBI), as
well as the Kripo in Wittlich Eifel (the local police close to where
my family lives in Germany) as well as the Belgian police in Antwerp.
Antwerp is where my dad got castrated on June 26 of 1999. Wesley
Clark was present in his green NATO uniform. 2 Belgian police guys of
the Antwerp police who had brought me to the Stuyvenberg Hospital
where this took place, have taken pictures of my violently bleeding
dad who at the time was handcuffed to a hospital bed and had his own
cut off penis in his mouth. Clark was very proud of what he had just
done. Only about 10 month later, in April of 2000 I needed to visit a
furniture fair in Milan, Italy and was spending time right over the
Italian border in a Hotel called Hotel Village au Lac in Zwitserland.
Within a few hours after my arrival in that Hotel Clark showed up and
after breaking into my hotel room in the middle of the night (he got
seen by the Swiss police who had been called), he was the next
morning claiming that so Clark literally: "....it is your fault
that I got fired from my NATO job......" At that time in April
of 2000 I had not yet pressed criminal charges against him anywhere,
so it could not possibly have been my fault, but it is of course very
possible that the 2 police guys of the Antwerp police who had taken
the pictures had presented their evidence to Nato and that this in
combination with Clarks usual way too aggressive and very unsubtile
behavior contributed to the fact that he got fired from his NATO job
somewhere in the summer of 1999. The official version at Wikipedia is
that Clark received a phone call from the US defense minister in the
summer of 1999 informing him that he would be relieved of his duties
per May of 2000.
So
it is very uncertain if NATO or the Pentagon had the good sense to
get rid of a nasty torturer straight away, the moment that they
noticed what a nasty criminal animal Clark really is. I find that an
unrealistic idea given the behavior and mentality that the Pentagon
has shown in Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo. It would be great if both
Nato and Pentagon would fire everyone straight away that shows
criminal behavior. The sad reality however is, that these facilities
have criminal behavior themselves and find it very normal to get away
with it.
Because
of financial reason (I have not been working since 2010) I can not
afford to send around hundreds of enregisterd letters every week
otherwise I would. (1 letter per enregisterd snail mail costs 7,50
euro in the Netherlands). But I do plan to send letters describing
the situation in great detail to the White House, to NATO plus to the
Dutch Royal family.
They
will have to answer to my letters and in all likelyhood will end up
putting blatant lies on paper. That of course is not fun but will
help me in the long run to make the case in court in the future. The
difficulty in this particular case is that I am not only forced
having to battle against 1 particular corrupt government but I am
forced to battle against 3 or 4 corrupt governments who all took part
in the situation and seem to find it the most normal thing in the
world that they would be allowed to commit such heinous crimes as
torturing a very innocent person for such a long time (remember Clark
started to torture my dad as far back as 1992, so this situation has
been going on for more than 23 years by now) and would have a right
to get away with this shit.
Among
other things I will demand an anwser from both Nato as well as from
the White House if Clark ever had any orders to target my family and
torture my dad.
Of
course the answer that I expect is the usual lies: No we do not
torture, our government never does such things and of course he had
no orders.
If
Clark would have orders to go and torture a certain person, either
Nato or the White House would never want to admit that but it
actually very much seems to me that fucking Clark has always done
whatever he wants and his following the needs of his large ego and
just expects to get away with it because he used to work for the
Pentagon. I can not find any motivate that either Nato or the White
House could have to give him such orders. But once this very criminal
behavior has taken place, both Nato and the White House do not want
the embarrassment and help to cover up the crime.
The
entire situation is a giant outrage and I would have to be very
wealty to be able to hire good private investigators plus a team of
at least 4 lawyers (1 for each country that Clark has tortured in) in
order to have a good chance to get something done. And at the same
time I very much doubt that a criminal psychopath like Clark would
ever dare to torture someone who is either wealthy or a celebrity
(like for example Richard Branson or Bill Gates) because even
criminal psychopath's or sadist's chose their victims partly on what
they expect to get away with.
As
one of you stated in his comment: It is unimagineable that anyone
would ever make up such a complicated and unpleasend story about
torture, if this was not true. That is very correct. If I was an
attention seeker, I would certainly try to come up with a much
easier, uncomplicated and preferably positive story to gain
attention. It makes no sense at all to tell a very complicated and
negative story because that is not at all what people like to hear.
I
can certainly think of many positive things that I would much rather
do with my time than having to spend my days trying to figure out how
to make a dent in a battle against multiple very corrupt governments,
with no budget at all. It is not a battle that anyone would ever
chose to have to fight. But I do not have a choice.
Giving
up on my dad and getting used to the idea that it has to be ok that
he is getting violently tortured is certainly not an option. And just
forgetting about what I know, is also not an option. Even if I would
not succeed in my goal to bring him back alive (my dad has turned 83
years old on March 18 of 2015), it seems that I will be forced to
keep busy with this case for the rest of my live.
It
makes no sense to ever give up because Clark does not ever leave me
in peace There is not a single firm that I have worked for since 1992
that did not receive visits from Clark with lies, libel, slander and
bullshit in order to stalk and harass me at my work. So even if I
wanted to go back to work, I could expect more trouble from fucking
Clark anyway. So even after my dad passes away I will have to keep
battling the evil empires that are helping to cover up this very
heinous case because I have a very strong believe that this situation
is so outraggeous that we should never allow something like this to
ever happen again.
In
answer to someone's question on here, why I feel that the electric
chair would be appropriate for Clark: Clark is a US citizen, the very
corrupt Dutch police even uses that fact to try and sell the idea
that they would not be allowed to investigate him which is total
bullshit. Under international law the police in every country of
Europe is required to take down criminal charges and start
investigating. Even though Europe does not have the death penalty
anymore, the US does and given the very heinous nature of Clarks
crimes and the fact that if you torture someone long enough (in my
dads case 23 years by now) you will end up committing a murder in the
first degree. Many laws even consider the motives why someone
committed a crime like murder. Certain reasons are considered
especially heinous, like for example greed, jealousy or killing
someone in order to wipe away the witness of another crime is
considered especially heinous. But also hate crimes committed out of
rasist motives are also considered especially heinous.
I
have reason to believe that Clark is torturing my dad out of a racist
motive.
Clark
has had more than 23 years to reconsider his actions that seems like
plenty of time to find a consciense if he had one. It is plenty of
time to wake up, turn around and try to solve the situation in a
positive manner.
So
I am going to keep pushing and asking for the most strict penalty
that the US justice system has. And that is the electric chair. I am
very much aware that it is not realistic to believe that Clark will
end up on it. But it does help me to voice my anger. I also find
Clarks crime of very bloody torture way more heinous than for example
robbing a store and by accident shooting someone in the head of the
moment.
I
have dared to put on paper multiple times that I consider shooting
Clark perfectly legal and self defence if he dares to come around
again and have send that message to all sorts of international police
facilities and judges plus district attorneys. It is my way of trying
to convince these people that they need to do their fucking job and
investigate the case or I will of course be forced to take matters
into my own hands. I have no clue if that works but I am pretty fed
up with the mountains of bullshit that I receive from all sorts of
international government facilites all trying to convince me that no
one is quite the right facility to investigate anything.
For
example: The torturing and lying Dutch police claim that: A. they
would not have enough time to investige. B. they would not be allowed
to investigate because Clark is an American (total BS) and C. they
would as a local police station be way to small to investigate either
the Pentagon or NATO. They do however not feel too small to torture,
rape, steel and lie about it.
The
German former minister of Justice (Mrs. Leutheusser Schnarrenberger)
has informed me on paper that it is not at all her job to investigate
anything but rather that she is in the business of creating new law.
That however the police in the entire country of Germany will gladly
except criminal charges and that they will than make sure that the
provided information goes where it needs to go.
Most
of the police forces in the country do not see it that way. I have
had police in Germany claiming that they would be unable to find any
information inside their own computer even after I and other police
forces had handed in detailed information to them up to 3 times. I
have had police people scream at me on the phone that they do not
want to receive any more information from me which is pretty weird
considering that the German law states that the police is obligated to
investigate anything illegal and is even required to press criminal
charges themselves the moment that they learn of a crime being
committed, and that is even if they assume that they will be unable
to find the evidence. And of course it must be pretty logical to
anyone that it will be pretty impossible to find evidence of any
crime if you are too stupid to find information inside your own
computersystem or refuse to investigate anything. That has got to be
the easiest way to make sure that a criminal perpetraitor gets away
with his crimes by simply refusing to investigate.
Strangley
enough I have had phone calls with people inside the White House and
within NATO who are very friendly and very correct and to the point
with their information. The White House has stated on the phone that
the FBI would not be allowed to investigate the Pentagon. Nato has
people who have studied law and are very correct with their
information and actually pretend that it is perfectly normal for the
police in any country to just take down criminal charges, and than
start an investigation of the case regardless who has committed the
crime.
Of
course there is no reason why Nato should feel threatened by any
police investigation. They know very well that most police stations
are not jumping with joy by the idea of having to investigate either
the Pentagon or Nato.
I
had a very interesting phone call with a district attorny in Berlin a
few years ago who had been particularly creative in his way to let me
know on paper that he does believe my story but will nevertheless not
investigate anything. On the phone he was stating: Well if the BND
(German equivelant of the CIA) is involved in the case, even I as a
district attorney will not be able to get any information out of them
so I will not be able to make the case.
That
particular district attorney had taken a situation in September of
2007 that I had described on paper as Clark stalking me once again
along the German highway and turned that into an attempted murder on
me. The district attorney was declaring on paper that he had opened a
case into the investigation of an attempted murder on me and closed
the case the same day for reasons of not being able to find the prove
of it. Most other district attorneys are usually using the much
easier and way more logical statement that if no crime has occured
within their own jurisdiction it is not their place to investigate
the case.
The
funny thing about this particular district attorney is however, that
while I had described the situation along the German highway of
September 2007 as Clark stalking me once again and nothing else,
there are reasons to assume that Clark was entertaining the notion of
getting me killed that day, but decided against it because he could
not get away with it unseen. Clark was travelling in a black BMW with
belgian lisence plates as usual when he is travelling in Europe. So
it very much seems as if Nato would still be aiding the criminal shit
with material (cars) as well as information (satellite equipment) in
order to find my exact location at all times. There were people in my
area, that same day, while Clark was present that seemed to be
working for the German Army. As if Clark had lend some equipment of
Nato to try and get me killed and the German Army was just present at
the location to let him know that they did not intent to tolerate
more shit from him. That is what the situation looked like to me but
of course an attempted murder that did not take place is very
difficult to prove and when sending information to the police I try
to stay factual and not further complicate the story by describing
fuzy stuff that seems like it good be going on. All the more
surprising that this district attorney takes a situation that I had
described as Clark stalking me once again and calls it an attempted
murder on me, but is making a fuzz about the fact that he would not
be able to receive any information from the BND. As if he had checked
with either the German Army or the BND and they have informed him
that what I so casualy described as stalking me in September of 2007
along the German highway was actually an attempt of Clark to get me
killed. It is very possible that the criminal animal would have gone
through with his plans if the German Army had not send around some
people to that location.
Anyway,
what I am trying to say is: Thank you all very much for taking the
time to care about this and signing my petition. The case will never
go away and it seems that I will be forced to keep this up for the
rest of my live. But the fact that we expect our governments to obey
the laws that they have often created themselves is a case that is
important to make. And no one should ever be allowed to get away with
very heinous torture. In my opinion it is one of the worst crimes
that anyone could possibly commit. So no wonder that I find it normal
to insist that Clark deserves the death penalty. Torture and
pre-meditated murder are not legal in any country in the world and as
much as I am not a fan of the death penalty, there are situations and
crimes that are so vicious that killing the perpetraitor is the only
thing that makes any sense. And fucking Clark has had more than 23
years to re-consider and change his behavior and he never does. There
are plenty of people on death row in the US who have committed much
lesser crimes. I can not possibly find any logic or justice in the
fact that someone like Julian Assange gets persecuted for breaking a
condom but that fucking Clark expects to get away with 6 counts of
very bloody and outrageously long torture, 2 counts of kidnapping, 3
counts of breaking and entering, more than 23 years of stalking and
harassment plus a very organized murder in the first degree if my dad
does not come back and would have a right to believe that he should
get away with it.
Thank
you all for your support and your signature and by all means feel
free to pass the information on to your friends or the media in your
country.
Edith Komes
